A Multi-Center Randomized Study Assessing If Validated Short Videos Improve Sinus Education.

TitleA Multi-Center Randomized Study Assessing If Validated Short Videos Improve Sinus Education.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2025
AuthorsBailey CEric, Cabrera-Muffly C, Chen PG, Farrell N, Rangarajan SV, Yim M, Irish J, Le CH, Chang EH
JournalAnn Otol Rhinol Laryngol
Volume134
Issue6
Pagination455-458
Date Published2025 Jun
ISSN1943-572X
KeywordsClinical Competence, Educational Measurement, Endoscopy, Female, Humans, Internship and Residency, Male, Otolaryngology, Paranasal Sinuses, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Video Recording
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if a short 10-minute video of either CT images (Video1: V1) or CT and endoscopic surgical videos (Video 2: V2) could be used to improve sinonasal anatomy knowledge in medical students (Med) and otolaryngology residents (OtoR).

BACKGROUND: YouTube is a widely used platform for surgical training, yet many educational videos are of poor quality. We developed and validated two 10-minute narrated videos of sinus anatomy, the first (V1) incorporated CT images of critical structures while the second (V2) combined CT images and surgical endoscopic video. In tandem, we developed a sinonasal assessment used to test sinonasal anatomy, surgical landmarks, and situational awareness.

METHODS: We performed a multicenter, randomized IRB-approved educational study evaluating the efficacy of the V1 and V2 videos by comparing pre-test (PrT) and post-test (PoT) scores in Med and OtoR subject groups. Subjects then watched the alternate video and preferences were assessed.

RESULTS: A total of 30 Med and 37 OtoR successfully completed the study at 6 different institutions. There were significant differences in pre-test knowledge with OtoR scoring higher than Med in all 3 pre-test subdomains [(S1: 4.3 v s2.9,  < .0001, S2: 4.4 vs 3.1,  < .0001, and S3: 4.6 vs 3.2,  < .0001)]. In the Med group, both V1 and V2 educational videos significantly improved post-test scores compared to pre-test scores (V1: 10.06 vs 12.59,  = .0005; V2: 8.23 vs 11.08,  = .0008). In the OtoR group, only the V2 educational video showed significant improvement (13.24 vs 14.76,  < .0001). Both groups thought the videos were helpful and improved their spatial awareness of sinus anatomy.

CONCLUSIONS: Short, validated videos significantly improve sinonasal education and should be incorporated in modern training programs.

DOI10.1177/00034894251322653
Alternate JournalAnn Otol Rhinol Laryngol
PubMed ID39985413
Faculty Reference: 
Eugene H. Chang, MD
Christopher Le, MD, FACS